George Orwell - Access is not Excess
What would George Orwell make of the Internet? Would he approve or disapprove?
At first, there is the temptation to assume that Orwell would denounce the Internet, seeing it as the embodiment of Big Brother: it is an aid to surveillance and meddling in the life of the ordinary person. As digital image processing becomes more sophisticated, there is the possibility of a true, Big Brother-style telescreen that is able to monitor your every movement, from cameras so small that they will become invisible to the human eye.
There are CCTV cameras everywhere in Britain and in the end they will be linked via the Internet and used to check-up on people, criminal or not. There will be instant checks on anyone as they walk through a town centre or drive anywhere in the whole country - instant checks on car registrations, and so forth. I just feel sorry for those sad people in the police control room, sitting there, in head-phones, spying on people all day long; how sad is that?
This is the part of the Internet which Orwell would hate. When these capabilities are combined with DNA databases and perhaps even microchips that transmit information about a person, there is no end to the insidious uses to which information technology can be put. It all depends on the law and to what extent the individual will be protected, via Data Protection legislation and stuff like that.
With the new Celldar system of tracking mobile phone signals, combined with GPS, there will be no escape should someone, somewhere wish to follow you (unless you throw away your phone). There is even a new project to digitally record everyone's mobile phone calls, using various software to identify suspect words.
On the other hand, I have just spent several hours reading about Orwell – probably my favourite author, along with George Gissing – at home on a screen in my own private room, at no cost, and without the means or the time to go out and buy or borrow books. This is all thanks to the Internet. I have read about where Orwell used to live in London, seen photographs and street maps of where he spent his time; I have read excerpts from his many articles in the Tribune magazine (mostly banal); I have seen whole, digital copies of most of his works, at no cost at all, unless you include the price of the computer and the internet connection.
I am a sort of anti-Winston Smith, a person with almost total freedom to the sum of the world's information and knowledge, all accessible from my unit at home. And when the Internet eventually expands - which is inevitable - to include almost every word ever published in the world, there will be no need for the dull, dreary, dusty and tatty life of Gordon Comstock, the copywriter in Keep the Aspidistra Flying, or of Orwell himself when he worked in that north London bookshop. I think Orwell would appreciate a digital world more than people think.
Orwell might disapprove of the vast freedom of information (of access to documents and pictures, that is) on the grounds of loss of earnings, since copyright abuse is rampant on the internet. He would lose money.
There may be issues of censorship in the future, and memory holes, and stuff, once the access and handling of content is more carefully monitored and controlled. Contrary, the internet has provided - as if by miracle, in the space of a mere twenty five years - instant, world publishing for anyone in the world. Take this 'blog', for example; I'm writing this blog for no cost, at home, and publishing it instantly to a possible audience of billions of people (the actual audience may only be one - me!). This is another aspect that Orwell would approve of.
In many ways, the Internet is democratic and a stalwart of freedom of speech. There are many reports from the war in Iraq which would simply be read by no-one a mere forty years ago, or only with the allowance of various newspaper and magazine companies.
In his article, Books vs. Cigarettes, Orwell makes an interesting case for the inexpense of reading. Now, Orwell can do more reading, of more variety, contribute himself - all instantly - for virtually no cost at all. There is no requesting books down at the library, carrying them home, thinking, as a result, of another book that you would like to read, and then repeating the process all over again. It is now all instant.
Even in his remote farmhouse, Barnhill, on the island of Jura, Orwell could access any information, anywhere in the entire world. When you want peace and quiet, you simply turn off the computer. When you need to write, you use a word-processor, not the old manual typewriter that he would've used, re-typing page after page, editing by hand. Now, it's all done instantly, a personal memory hole on the page in front of you. It is for the best.
Orwell Today, a brilliant, amateur website where a Canadian woman visits Orwell sites in Britain (complete with many photographs):
http://www.orwelltoday.com/
Another brilliant amateur Orwell website, with pictures of Orwell locations throughout London:
http://www.zardoz.net/orwell/index.html
Celldar, mobile phone tracking project:
see The Observer
Books vs. Cigarettes George Orwell, 1946:
http://whitewolf.newcastle.edu.au
(search for Orwell section of this website).
As I Please, Orwell's column in Tribune (the entire collection):
as above.